an interview with Joanna Macy by Sarah van Gelder Joanna Macy interview 142k Download this Adobe Acrobat file to print or view the original
Joanna
Macy, writer and Buddhist scholar, took time out from the WTO protests
to speak with YES! editor Sarah Ruth van Gelder. Their conversation
took place the day following the massive blockade of the WTO and the
labor-led march through Seattle.
Sarah:We've been focused on the activities surrounding the
WTO here in Seattle for the last few days. As we speak, people are
being arrested for walking in the "no-protestâ" zones and bused off to
jail. Before we head back into downtown ourselves, I want to ask for
your reflections on change at a larger level, which you're calling "the
Great Turning."
Joanna:The term "Great Turning" is just one
way to name the vast revolution that's going on because our way of life
cannot be sustained.
There are three main
dimensions of it that I see. The first involves holding actions that
slow the destruction caused by the industrial growth society. This
economic system is doomed because it measures its success by how fast
it uses up the living body of Earth - extracting resources beyond
Earth's capacity to renew, and spewing out wastes faster than Earth's
capacity to absorb. It is now in runaway mode, devouring itself at an
accelerating rate.
Holding actions are
important because they buy time. They are like a first line of defense;
they can save a few species, a few ecosystems, and some of the gene
pool for future generations. In Seattle this week we saw how holding
actions -in this case nonviolent blockades -can slow down efforts to
give transnational corporations a yet freer hand in plundering our
heritage.
But holding actions are not enough to
create a sustainable society. You've got to have new social and
economic structures, new ways of doing things. And these seem to be
springing up at a faster rate than at any time in our human history. I
consider YES!so important, precisely because you
are pointing to these innovations, which are rarely reported in the
mainstream, corporate-controlled media.
Alternative
structures and analyses constitute the second dimension of the Great
Turning. They were sure evident in all the teach-ins and resource
sharing going on this week in Seattle. People are wising up to the
assumptions and agreements that allow a few to get richer and richer
while more and more people sink below the poverty line. Fresh social
and economic experiments are sprouting, and new alliances are forming
too. Yesterday I marched alongside farm workers and longshoremen, and I
was moved to see how labor unions and environmental groups are making
common cause at last.
But new coalitions and
new ways of production and distribution are not enough for the Great
Turning. They will shrivel and die unless they are rooted in deeply
held values -in our sense of who we are, who we want to be, and how we
relate to each other and the living body of Earth. That amounts to a
shift in consciousness, which is actually happening now at a rapid
rate. This is the third dimension of the Great Turning, and it is, at
root, a spiritual revolution, awakening perceptions and values that are
both very new and very ancient, linking back to rivers of ancestral
wisdom.
I loved the banners and banter of
yesterday's marchers, how they conveyed these values with such
exuberance and humor, making fun of our greed and shortsightedness, and
celebrating solidarity with all life from sea turtles to butterflies.
The ancestors were in our midst, too; every block or two, a United Farm
Workers' group with drums and feathers stopped to perform an Aztec
dance.
Of course, a consciousness shift by
itself is insufficient for the Great Turning; you also have to have the
holding actions and the creation of alternative structures. These three
dimensions are totally interdependent and mutually reinforcing. I love
seeing it this way because it gets us off that dead argument: "Is it
more important to work on yourself? or Is it more important to be out
there on the barricades?" Those are such stupid arguments, because
actually we have to do it all. And as we do it together, it gains
momentum and becomes more self-sustaining.
You
know, I often imagine that future generations will look back at us and
say, "Oh, bless 'em. Those ancestors were right there in the Great
Turning! There was so much they had to change, and they didn't even
know if they could pull it off."
And we might
not pull it off. There's no guarantee that this tremendous shift will
kick in before our life support systems unravel irretrievably.
Actually,
the very fact that there's no guarantee of success is what will draw
forth our greatest courage and creativity. If I could give you a pill
or potion to convince you that everything is going to be okay, that
would hardly elicit your purest creativity and chutzpah.
We
could wait around forever before we act, trying to compute our chances
of success. But our time to come alive is right now, on this edge of
possibility.
From our own life experience, we
know there's never a guarantee -whether we're falling in love, or going
into labor to birth a baby, or devoting ourselves to a piece of land,
turning the soil and watching for rain. We don't ask for proof that
we'll succeed and that everything will turn out as we want. We just go
ahead, because life wants to live through us!
Sarah:In
social movements of the past, it seems to me that people looked to a
leader or to some doctrine to lead them forward. Now, people seem to
take the responsibility upon themselves; they seem to want to know in
their bones what needs to be done and how they can, authentically, be a
part of it.
Joanna: Yes. Everywhere I
go, talking with folks of all ages and walks of life, I sense this
search for authenticity. People are wanting to take responsibility for
their lives, both politically and spiritually. It's beautiful.
At
the most fundamental level, there's an appetite for reconnecting with
the sacred. Instead of depending on anyone else for that connection, we
want to be able to know it and embody it ourselves.
What
is the sacred? It's the ground of our being. It's the whole of which we
are a part. It's what imbues our life with meaning and beauty. Of
course, there are different ways of perceiving our relation to it.
Mainstream western society has, by and large, related to the sacred by
projecting it outwards, setting it apart as a God "out there" to
worship and obey. We made the sacred transcendent, and in its
honor created ziggurats, cathedrals, masterpieces of art and choral
music -perhaps our greatest cultural achievements.
But
after several millennia of assigning the sacred to a transcendent
dimension removed from ordinary life, the world around us begins to go
dead and loses its luminosity and meaning. The Earth is reduced to a
supply store of material resources and a sewer for our wastes. And in
such a world, devoid of the sacred, anything goes -buy up, sell off,
consume as much as you can!
What's so beautiful
about being alive at this moment is that the pendulum is starting to
swing the other way. We are retrieving the projection. We are taking
the sacred back into our lives. The swing is from transcendence to
immanence. The most vital movement of our era involves making the
sacred immanent again. I see it happening in every spiritual tradition
-in the Jewish Renewal movement, in Creation Spirituality, in women's
spirituality, and in the resurgence of Wicca, and the teachings of
ancient indigenous peoples. We are reawakening to the sacredness of
life itself, in the soil and air and water, in our brothers and sisters
of other species, and in our own bodies.
I
spoke of this as a swing of the pendulum, but a metaphor I like even
better comes from Ludwig Feuerbach, a German theologian of the mid-19th
century. He said that our apprehensions of the sacred have a rhythm
like the pumping action of the heart. Just as the heart pumps blood out
from the center of the body, we project outwards our sense of the
sacred, so that we can behold its majesty and fall on our knees before
it in wonder and awe. Feuerbach reminded us that the heartbeat is a
two-way action -systole and diastole: the pumping out is followed by
drawing the blood back through the heart. When the sacred becomes too
remote, you take it back in, to let it lubricate your life. The
retrieval of the projection is not an endpoint either. When we get
stuck too long in immanence, the sacred becomes indistinguishable from
anything else; it becomes bland, taken for granted. So the heart beat
goes on, ever renewing our sense of the holy. To perceive it this way
frees me to see that they need each other, these two movements of the
heart.
Sarah: Tell me a little more about how it affects someone to start seeing the sacred as more immanent.
Joanna:To
see all life as holy rescues us from loneliness and the sense of
futility that comes with isolation. The sacred becomes part of this
encounter -part of you sitting in front of me, present in that stand of
bamboo, and even in myself. I don't have to go to Chartres Cathedral to
be in the presence of the Divine. It's right here.
This
means that our sorrow is sacred, too. Within us all is grief for what
is happening to our world -the despoiling of Earth, the extinction of
our brother/sister species, the massive suffering of our fellow humans.
But when we feel isolated, we stifle that sorrow and rage in order to
fit in better and to avoid aggravating the loneliness.
Experiencing
the sacred as immanent helps people to befriend their pain for the
world and not fear that it will further isolate them. This is a matter
of practical urgency, because to repress and discount the grief and
dread we feel on behalf of all beings locks us into the status quo. In
the work I do with groups, we reframe our pain for the world,
recognizing it as the capacity to "suffer with," which is the literal
meaning of compassion. It is not only honored in all spiritual
traditions, it also serves as wholesome feedback, necessary to our
survival. To recognize this brings us back to life: "It's okay for me
to be here. It's okay for me to hurt, even. It's okay for me to weep
for people who aren't even born yet. That's because I belong. That's
because I am part of the sacred living body of Earth through all time."
This sense of belonging is spreading with the
"new story" of our universe that Thomas Berry, Brian Swimme, Sister
Miriam McGillis and others are bringing in now. Drawing from the latest
discoveries of science, they show how each of us is an inseparable part
of this ever-unfolding story since it first began in the primal
"flaring forth."
Everywhere I see people
starting prayer groups and healing groups, sacred circles and home
churches. They don't wait until they have Masters of Divinity degrees,
or are ordained. They're ordaining themselves. They are gathering
together because they find they can experience this sacredness better
in groups.
Moreover, people are expressing this
sense of belonging by stepping forth. That was obvious in yesterday's
march. People came in the scores of thousands because their hearts'
desire now is for more than just drawing a paycheck so they can pay the
mortgage and sit in front of the tv. They want to be out there with
their fellow-citizens, taking risks for the sake of something greater
than their separate, individual lives.
When you
act on behalf of something greater than yourself, you begin to feel it
acting through you with a power that is greater than your own. The
religious term for this empowerment is grace, and we conceived of it as
coming from God. Now, we are feeling graced by other beings and by
Earth itself. Those with whom and on whose behalf we act give us
strength and eloquence and staying power we didn't know we had.
We
celebrate this, for example, in the Council of All Beings. In that
reverent and playful community ritual, we step aside from our human
identity to speak on behalf of other life-forms. As the beings report
the suffering they now experience, it becomes clear that their fate
depends on that very species that is behaving with such greed and fear.
So they decide to offer to the humans their own particular strengths.
Whether you speak for eagle or worm or cypress tree, you think of what
gifts you could share -farseeing eye, patience, readiness to go through
the dark. In the process we realize that the gifts we're naming are
already known to us and available. We just need to practice knowing
that and remembering that we are sustained by each other in the web of
life. Such practice helps us to decondition ourselves from centuries of
old-paradigm thinking, which we've used in ways that have made us so
lonely and selfish and nuts and powerless. It all goes together. Greed
and powerlessness go together.
So we practice
knowing our true power, which comes as a gift, like grace, because in
truth it is sustained by others. We can draw on the wisdom and beauty
and strengths of our fellow humans and our fellow species like so much
money in the bank. I find that incredibly empowering, because it means
I can go into a situation and trust that the courage and intelligence
required will be supplied.
Sarah:Let's
circle back, now. How does this shift toward experiencing the Divine as
immanent relate to the Great Turning you spoke of earlier?
Joanna:That's
a great question. I think the felt presence of the sacred will be like
fuel for the Great Turning. It will help us hang in there through a
tough time. In the breakdown of the Industrial Growth Society, things
will get a lot harder and scarier for a while. And when we get scared
we get mean. We turn on each other. I think our greatest danger is fear
and the blaming and scapegoating that fear arouses. To hold the
conviction that all life is holy will help us withstand the temptations
to demagoguery and divisiveness.
Sarah:So this implies a different way of treating those whom we consider opponents?
Joanna:Yes,
yes. There's no private salvation in this. The people who don't agree
with us become like a noble adversary, challenging us to develop our
smarts and courage. We still have to walk together into the future.
They're like brother/sister cells in the larger body of life. We may
have to take some pretty strong, surgical steps to limit their exercise
of greed, hatred, and stupidity. But those three poisons, as they're
known in Buddhism, are the problem. We want to liberate our adversaries
and ourselves from these three. We're not really free until they're
free too. I think that helps with the exercise of nonviolence, don't
you?
Sarah:Yes. It's such a tricky
business because I think it can be very difficult to say, for example,
"There's a real problem with corporate globalization. There's a real
problem with the WTO." And at the same time recognize that the
individuals who are involved in those activities are nonetheless as
sacred as any other beings.
Joanna:And
that they're in bondage to our real enemies, which are greed, hatred,
and delusion. Delusion or ignorance means the notion that we are
separate, that we can be immune to what we do to other people. Remember
at the march yesterday, there was a tall figure on stilts dressed as
the fat industrialist? I laughed and booed with the rest. I think it's
great to make fun of Greed -so long as we don't demonize individuals
who are caught up in its claws. I admit, it does get hard to avoid
making people like Charles Hurwitz the target of my rage, and to
remember, as Gandhi asked us to, that our target is not the person but
their actions -the clearcutting of the redwoods, the lockouts of the
steelworkers.
Sarah:One of the major
sources of conflict around the world is differences in ethnicity,
culture, and religion. If this sense of the Divine becoming immanent,
if that is happening across religious traditions, could that be a sign
of hope for conflicts among religions?
Joanna:Mmm.
My mind flies to Afghanistan and the resurgence of a totalitarian
patriarchy where the sacred is seen as punitive. Yet, out of the same
religion comes Rumi and Hafiz and the Sufi tradition with its
celebration of the sacredness of all life.
Fundamentalism
rears its head in all religions now. It's a reaction against the
radical uncertainty of this moment in history. In such times, we tend
to revert to the security of rock-bound belief and vent our anxieties
in scapegoating others. The temptation to take refuge in our own
self-righteousness is strong. But now there's also a strong current in
the other direction. Last June, when my husband Fran and I were in
Israel -that land so epochally torn by competing claims to the sacred
-what we heard most of all from the Jews and the Arabs was their
spiritual hunger to reconnect with each other. Clearly those to whom
the sacred is becoming immanent have a role to play in easing the
hatreds bred by the fundamentalists. And they are playing that role
already.
People are sick and tired of being
pitted against each other when there's already so much suffering and
the Earth itself is under assault. They're ready to reconnect and honor
the life we share. That is the great adventure of our time. And it's
happening.
Joanna Macy is a scholar of Buddhism and general systems theory and author of Coming Back to Life; World as Lover World as Self; the Dharma of Natural Systems;and Rilke's Book of Hours.
Reprints/Reposts :: Contact Us :: 206-842-0216 :: Toll-Free Subscriptions 1-800-937-4451
YES! is published by the Positive Futures Network, 284 Madrona Way NE, Ste 116, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110-2870